<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The SEO News Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-9866693a" type="application/json"/><link>http://theseonewsblog.disqus.com/</link><description>All the Latest on Search Engine Marketing, WordPress, and Web 2.0</description><atom:link href="http://theseonewsblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:53:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What Is Dublin Core Metadata?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4924/dublin-core-metadata/#comment-422974542</link><description>If you used the same plugin as I did, then the only option is to fill in your license for a license Meta tag. If this doesn't apply, then, leave it blank.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You would only have a license if you're using someone else's software on a website, for example. Then, you might want to use your license key for verification purposes. If it's just your blog, no worries.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:53:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Is Dublin Core Metadata?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4924/dublin-core-metadata/#comment-422954301</link><description>I am trying to use the  Dublin Core for wordpress plugin and I am not understanding if I am suppose to input any information on the actual pages. I have all the options checked, but, am I suppose to input the info?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guesst</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:08:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa and Analytics: How to Use What You Learn</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2096/alexa-and-analytics-how-to-use-what-you-learn/#comment-422589900</link><description>I actually learn to know how to check alexa a year ago. But learning the real sense of why it has an alexa rankings, are still on the process.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Spinal Cord Injury Attorneys</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa and Analytics: How to Use What You Learn</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2096/alexa-and-analytics-how-to-use-what-you-learn/#comment-416892274</link><description>Alexa provides information about websites including Top Sites,Internet Traffic Stats and Metrics, Related Links, Online Reviews Contact Informationand Search Analytics for SEM and SEO optimization. The Alexa Toolbar is a browser add-onthat shows data about sites as you surf the web&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Privatdetektiv</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa and Analytics: How to Use What You Learn</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2096/alexa-and-analytics-how-to-use-what-you-learn/#comment-415025747</link><description>Alexa rank must be given importance when you are about to engage in SEO field. Beside from the Alexa rank you are also to give importance on the Page Rank.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mode für mollige damen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:27:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa and Analytics: How to Use What You Learn</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2096/alexa-and-analytics-how-to-use-what-you-learn/#comment-412294291</link><description>If you are paying attention, you can resolve the matter quickly with a&lt;br&gt;helpful reply. If you don't use social media, then there's no telling what your&lt;br&gt;customers are saying about your brand. Getting involved gives you a chance to&lt;br&gt;monitor and engage in the conversations.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online brand</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fun SEO Video to Make You Smile</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4949/fun-seo-video-smile/#comment-409747231</link><description>Matt Cutts is one of the most reputed person. The panda update is favourable for genuine and value based contents. Many spammy sites will be eliminated soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cisco 1130</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:13:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa and Analytics: How to Use What You Learn</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2096/alexa-and-analytics-how-to-use-what-you-learn/#comment-405858559</link><description>Alexa is a solid web analytics example of the science of producing &lt;br&gt;unreliable facts from reliable figures. Alexa gets the data used in the &lt;br&gt;"analysis and rank calculations" it performs from &lt;br&gt;the Alexa toolbar that active in browsers track the web pages visited. &lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reputation Management</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a &amp;#8220;Good&amp;#8221; Link?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4908/good-link/#comment-405379494</link><description>Thanks, Jon. Yeah, the fact that you need to work on your entire website and not just the front door escapes many people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I enjoy reading your blog, too, my friend. Thanks for your comment!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a &amp;#8220;Good&amp;#8221; Link?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4908/good-link/#comment-405327164</link><description>Awesome post Pat! Gotta love "Google ranks pages, not websites". I think we tend to forget about the pages we try to rank when we send 90% of our links to our home page, as this is a huge issue few people do something about.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope to see more awesome posts on link building :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Cooper</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do Colors Affect Purchases?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4902/colors-affect-purchases/#comment-402997517</link><description>Thanks for your comment, Laurie! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Orange and yellow, really? Who knew? That's an interesting tidbit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole idea that color motivates certain emotions is a very fascinating subject, I agree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:02:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Do Colors Affect Purchases?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4902/colors-affect-purchases/#comment-402987568</link><description>Colors appeal and repel buyers and is used to slow people down and speed them up. It is important to know which you want to use for your business. Ever notice that yellows and oranges are very popular in fast food restaurants? That's to get people in and out quickly!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The industry for determining colors of the year/season is huge and goes into a deep science. Fascinating subject.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LaurieTossy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rel=Author: Are You Connected?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4876/relauthor-connected/#comment-395945274</link><description>Hi Elizabeth.... Yeah, I figured that out, too. :) Not sure what's wrong, but figured I'd use your post to go back over it again and see what was left out of the last explanation. LOL (We all tend to forget that one little item that makes the diff, eh?) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a WP plugin (Author META) that I'm using, but sure! I'd love to try yours. Let me know when it's ready.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:56:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rel=Author: Are You Connected?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4876/relauthor-connected/#comment-395940862</link><description>Hi Pat - Thank you for replying to my comment.   I see what you mean - I'd actually tried to write it for a non-tech audience!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I did want to point out to you that your page here (at the time of writing) is not validating in the Rich Snippets tool so the author markup is unlikely to work until you do get it to validate.  And even then it takes a while - I am still waiting for my  image to show up, yet for one of my students, hers are already showing up in the search results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it helps we are writing a free WordPress plugin to help people set up rel=author and if you like you could try it out as soon as we have finished it. It may help with the snippets validation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth Jamieson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:48:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rel=Author: Are You Connected?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4876/relauthor-connected/#comment-395929691</link><description>Hi Elizabeth, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment. Your blog post has a more detailed explanation, for people who are more tech savvy, which is great. And yes, I'm aware of the rich snippets tool. I chose not to include it since most of the folks who read my blog regularly need to take things in steps. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll be talking about rich snippets more over the next few weeks, and tomorrow, I'm giving readers a video so that they can learn more about what rich snippets are and why they're important.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just taking it one step at a time here, but your post is great!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I agree. G+ will be around a long time, but what I meant was it's important to Google that it we use it and work with it because it is so important, hence the tie-in to search.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:32:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rel=Author: Are You Connected?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4876/relauthor-connected/#comment-395879818</link><description>Pat - I just saw your post and read it with interest.  Have you checked your pages using the Rich Snippets tool?  Please check my instructions for doing rel=author out here  :  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.devonwebdesigners.com/3278/relauthor-step-by-step-for-wordpress/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.devonwebdesigners.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It explains how to set up and check that what you've done is working. I think that unlike Wave and Buzz this will be around for a long time as it is now tied to search results and ranking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth Jamieson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:20:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO Is NOT Dead</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/3531/seo-dead/#comment-386568751</link><description>Thanks for your comment. I agree with your post, too... 100%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO Is NOT Dead</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/3531/seo-dead/#comment-386390020</link><description>I very much agree and I just wrote this post on the same subject. Let me know what you think. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://jhagemann.blogspot.com/2011/12/stop-talking-about-seo-being-dead-seo.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://jhagemann.blogspot.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jhagemann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:25:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Algorithm Changes for December 2011</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4741/google-algorithm-december-2011/#comment-384246108</link><description>I agree, however, they still show up. And no, I'm not suggesting that you buy a parked domain and get rich. I'm just saying that GoDaddy, as an example, moves a page immediately to parked. If you have "Cash Parking" enabled, you might be making some dough. 'Course it's not much, but for some folks, especially those who are just starting out, even $1 makes them smile. So, in that light, they may not be pleased. Google is weeding out these pages more quickly, it seems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Algorithm Changes for December 2011</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4741/google-algorithm-december-2011/#comment-384225695</link><description>Regarding Google's algorithm change, it wasn't a &lt;br&gt;big deal. It allows them to simply find parked domains easier. They've &lt;br&gt;been delisting parked pages for quite some time now and parking has been&lt;br&gt; on the decline for years, so there's no news there - they'll just be &lt;br&gt;hitting more of them now. Parked pages haven't been able to secure major&lt;br&gt; rankings for 3+ years now except for extremely rare cases. In that &lt;br&gt;time, no one familiar with domains and parking has been expecting to buy&lt;br&gt; domains, park them, get search traffic and become rich - anyone who has&lt;br&gt; didn't do their homework first.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TopDomainDeal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:23:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SEO for YouTube: Get Your Channel to the Top</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/4767/seo-youtube-channel-top/#comment-383376351</link><description>The steps you mentioned are really cool mate.. thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">YoutubeFans</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 04:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Customize Camtasia Code for Your Blog</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/3270/camtasia-code-blog/#comment-369457329</link><description>That works, too... But what if you don't want the video on YouTube?  For example, you have a membership site that runs on Wishlist and the platform is obviously WordPress. You need to protect the content so that only members can see it. So, it's good to know how to alter the code.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your way works, for sure, but not if you're protecting content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comment!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Customize Camtasia Code for Your Blog</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/3270/camtasia-code-blog/#comment-369451122</link><description>There are a lot of hosting variables when inserting video in a website. The easiest way (imho) is in Camtasia to choose “Produce and Share” then “Share to YouTube” and Camtasia (version 7) will upload it to your YouTube account. Then, use the “embed video” link on YouTube for that video and paste it in to your web site page.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Runescape XP</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:56:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox Add-On: History Tree</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/1523/firefox-add-on-history-tree/#comment-360002786</link><description>Yep... Old post. Thanks for the update, Cees!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PatMarcello</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox Add-On: History Tree</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/1523/firefox-add-on-history-tree/#comment-359921473</link><description>That add-on and its owner disappeared. Here's an alternative: &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/nl/firefox/addon/fromwheretowhere/" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://addons.mozilla.org/nl/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cees Timmerman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
